Blog Reactions
Vulture: They Are Saying 'Douche' on Television!
Gawker: The Gray Lady and Her Sad, Shared, Empty Bag of "Douche" [Linguistics]
| @Kellrod w/r/t "douche" http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/business/media/14vulgar.html 12/8/2009 |
| An article last Saturday about the increased use of vulgar language on prime-time broadcast television misident.. http://bit.ly/1x0qv 11/21/2009 |
| @daedam there was actually a times article on this very topic the other day http://bit.ly/3yBDi2 11/20/2009 |
Fifteen Minutes To Live — The New York Times reports on increased use of "vulgar" words on primetime television. On many nights this fall, it has been possible to tune in to broadcast network television during prime time and hear a character call someone else a “douche.” In total, the word has surfaced at least 76 times already this year on 26 prime-time network series, according to research by the Parents Television Council, which compiled the statistics at the request of The New York Times. That is up from 30 uses on 15 shows in all of 2007 and ...
They Are Saying 'Douche' on Television!
Vulture —
... There is a whole hilarious article in the New York Times today about how the word "douche" is being said on TV all the time now, and how it's because TV writers need another word for "jerk," and how kids these days probably don't even know what it means. Highly recommended reading, but this was our favorite part: ...
The Gray Lady and Her Sad, Shared, Empty Bag of "Douche" [Linguistics]
Gawker —
Where, exactly, are you supposed to start when the New York Times runs a Page One media piece on the word "douche"? Times media writer Edward Wyatt penned a soft, round filing that was about the word "douche." It appeared on today's front page. This word is one with which this website (and media network) has a wide breadth of experience with. In November, 2006, former Gawker scribe Emily Gould wrote: Don't get us wrong. It's not that (50%) of our delicate ladyish sensibilities are offended or ...
The Gray Lady and Her Sad, Shared, Empty Bag of "Douche" [Linguistics]
Gawker —
[image] Where, exactly, are you supposed to start when the New York Times runs a Page One media piece on the word "douche"? Times media writer Edward Wyatt penned a soft, round filing that was about the word "douche." It appeared on today's front page. This word is one with which this website (and media network) has a wide breadth of experience with. In November, 2006, former Gawker scribe Emily Gould wrote: Don't get us wrong. It's not that (50%) of our delicate ladyish sensibilities are offended or anything; far from it. It's ...
The Grey Lady and Her Sad, Shared, Empty Bag of "Douche" [Linguistics]
Gawker —
Where, exactly, are you supposed to start when the New York Times runs a Page One media piece on the word "douche"? Times media writer Edward Wyatt penned a soft, round filing that was about the word "douche," but not about the origin of the word "douche." Naturally, this word is one in which this website (and media network) has a wide breadth of experience with. In November, 2006, former Gawker scribe Emily Gould wrote: Don't get us wrong. It's not that (50%) of our delicate ladyish ...
The Grey Lady and Her Sad, Shared, Empty Bag of "Douche" [Linguistics]
Gawker —
[image] Where, exactly, are you supposed to start when the New York Times runs a Page One media piece on the word "douche"? Times media writer Edward Wyatt penned a soft, round filing that was about the word "douche," but not about the origin of the word "douche." Naturally, this word is one in which this website (and media network) has a wide breadth of experience with. In November, 2006, former Gawker scribe Emily Gould wrote: Don't get us wrong. It's not that (50%) of our delicate ladyish sensibilities are offended or anything; ...
For The NYTimes, "Douche" Is Okay, But "Fat Chick" Isn't?
Gothamist —
... In an article that seems to blur the New York Times' own decency standards, the paper of record examines how the word "douche" has evolved from a personal hygiene product into a popular TV pejorative. We're not particularly concerned with the journalistic merits of the piece — we'll leave that to the ...
Tune In | 11.16.09
Tubular —
WELL, ****ING ****. : Whatever happened to ****ing standards? SPEAKING OF WORDS WE CAN'T USE HERE : Jon Gosselin? Why you so classy? HOW ABOUT INSTEAD OF SOME STUPID MULTI-SHOW CAMPAIGN WITH A BUNCH OF BALD DUDES RUNNING AROUND, WE JUST RETURN THE SHOW TO TUESDAYS NIGHTS? : I just don't understand why this is so hard. WATCH THIS Dancing With the Stars : We're down to the final four. (Team Kelly, all the way!) 7 p.m., ABC Inside the Actor's Studio : OK, listen. I know that Jon Bon made some sort of crazy deal with NBC, where Bon Jovi is supposed to ...



