vote down
flag
gawker.com - 6/13/2009
—
The New York Times is too prissy to mention to print the word fart on their classy website. But vintage Belgian porn? Mais oui, c'est l'art! The Times redacted Jason Jones' use of the word fart in an online interview today about the Daily Show correspondent's evisceration of the newspaper, ...
Comments
Blog Reactions
The ad hoc Grundyism of the New York Times
Radosh.net —
... But that's not what it's doing. After Gawker picked up the item, no doubt sending the Times web site more traffic than it's seen in years, the paper huffily took down not only the explicit trailer for Lumberjack, but the entire listing which was unobjectionable unless the Times intends to convey that even acknowledging the existence of softcore pornography is detrimental to the dignity of its readership. ...
Related Content

![NYTimes.com May Be Too Good for Farting, But Not for Belgian Porn [Nsfw]](http://images.dailyradar.com/media/uploads/showhype/story_preview/2009/06/13/nytimes_com_may_be_too_good_for_farting_but_not_fo.png)
