Video: Eva Mendes' Nip Slip in CK Perfume Ad Causes Stir
|
|
myanti posted 8/5/2008 from www.aceshowbiz.com [flag] |
Tags:
|
|
myanti posted 8/5/2008 from www.aceshowbiz.com [flag] |
Tags:
Share: Email Send to Friend Story Badge
myanti posted 8/5/2008 from www.celebrity-mania.com
Calvin Klein ad which features naked Eva Mendes has been banned from airing by U.S. broadcast networks.Yeeeah! - Snarky Celebrity Gossip found this 8/5/2008 on www.nydailynews.com
Step aside, Brooke Shields. There's a new controversial Calvin Klein girl. A Secret Obsession perfume ad featuring actress Eva Mendes has been banned by U.S. networks for its racy content.Right Celebrity found this 8/5/2008 on www.hollywoodgrind.com
TV censors have banned an Eva Mendes Calvin Klein Secret Obsession ad, because it shows body parts that are off limits. Click here to see the TV ad video. I’m glad TV banned the commercial. The best ads should be left to the Internet. ...firestar posted 8/5/2008 from girlretro.com
View Eva Mendes almost naked adsanythinghollywood posted 8/5/2008 from anythinghollywood.com
The new TV ad by Eva Mendes for Calvin Klein is out…or was out. A hot, sexy, racy ad that is causing quite a stir...myanti posted 8/11/2008 from www.aceshowbiz.com
myanti posted 8/2/2008 from www.aceshowbiz.com
myanti posted 8/12/2008 from www.aceshowbiz.com
myanti posted 7/28/2008 from www.aceshowbiz.com
myanti posted 8/7/2008 from www.aceshowbiz.com
OH NO!! found this 6 days ago on www.usatoday.com
Pop Crunch found this 14 hours ago on www.vanityfair.com
X17 Online found this 33 hours ago on www.youtube.com
OH NO!! found this 2 days ago on www.newsoftheworld.co.uk
captainobvious22 posted 4 days ago from www.celebgirlz.com
celebx posted 3 days ago from www.skinnyvscurvy.com
OH NO!! found this 3 days ago on www.popoholic.com
Pop Crunch found this 14 hours ago on www.vanityfair.com
OH NO!! found this 5 hours ago on www.people.com
Just Jared found this 3 hours ago on www.wmagazine.com
| Rankings | About | More |
|
|
Tools | Help |
Copyright 2008 Future US, Inc.

